The Question Concerning Technology: Difference between revisions
From charlesreid1
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
is in Greek ''legin, logos''. ''Legein'' is rooted in ''apophainesthni'', to bring forward into | is in Greek ''legin, logos''. ''Legein'' is rooted in ''apophainesthni'', to bring forward into | ||
appearance | appearance | ||
}} | |||
{{Quotes| | |||
Everything, then, depends upon this: that we ponder this arising and that, | |||
recollecting, we watch over it. How can this happen? Above all through our | |||
catching sight of what comes to presence in technology, instead of merely | |||
staring at the technological. So long as we represent technology as an instrument, | |||
we remain held fast in the will to master it. We press on past the essence | |||
of technology | |||
}} | |||
{{Quote| | |||
Because the essence of technology is nothing technological, essential reflection | |||
upon technology and decisive confrontation with it must happen in a | |||
realm that is, on the one hand, akin to the essence of technology and, on the | |||
other, fundamentally different from it. | |||
Such a realm is art. But certainly only if reflection on art, for its part, does | |||
not shut its eyes to the constellation of truth after which we are ''questioning''. | |||
Thus questioning, we bear witness to the crisis that in our sheer preoccupation | |||
with technology we do not yet experience the coming to presence of technology, | |||
that in our sheer aesthetic-mindedness we no longer guard and | |||
preserve the coming to presence of art. Yet the more questioningly we ponder | |||
the essence of technology, the more mysterious the essence of art becomes. | |||
The closer we come to the danger, the more brightly do the ways into the | |||
saving power begin to shine and the more questioning we become. For questioning | |||
is the piety of thought. | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 03:09, 13 November 2016
Technology itself is a contrivance, or, in Latin, an instrumentum.
Everything depends on our manipulating technology in the proper manner as a means. We will, as we say, “get” technology “spiritually in hand.” We will master it. The will to mastery becomes all the more urgent the more technology threatens to slip from human control.
To consider carefully (iiberlegen) is in Greek legin, logos. Legein is rooted in apophainesthni, to bring forward into appearance
Because the essence of technology is nothing technological, essential reflection upon technology and decisive confrontation with it must happen in a realm that is, on the one hand, akin to the essence of technology and, on the other, fundamentally different from it.Such a realm is art. But certainly only if reflection on art, for its part, does not shut its eyes to the constellation of truth after which we are questioning.
Thus questioning, we bear witness to the crisis that in our sheer preoccupation with technology we do not yet experience the coming to presence of technology, that in our sheer aesthetic-mindedness we no longer guard and preserve the coming to presence of art. Yet the more questioningly we ponder the essence of technology, the more mysterious the essence of art becomes.
The closer we come to the danger, the more brightly do the ways into the saving power begin to shine and the more questioning we become. For questioning is the piety of thought.