Cowpatty/Benchmarking: Difference between revisions
From charlesreid1
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
250 keys per second is way slower than Aircrack's 1200 keys per second - 5 times slower. | |||
The advantage of using cowpatty, even thought it's slower, is that you can use Rainbow Tables with cowpatty. | The advantage of using cowpatty, even thought it's slower, is that you can use Rainbow Tables with cowpatty. | ||
Latest revision as of 08:02, 21 August 2015
Speed Test
To speed test cowpatty, just run it with a wordfile of a short length. This will give you an estimate of how long cowpatty takes with a longer dictionary file.
For example, here is a test of cowpatty with a short wordlist:
$ wc -l short.txt 2360 short.txt $ cowpatty -r ./wpa.cap -f short.txt -s 64oz [...] 1689 passphrases tested in 6.50 seconds: 259.89 passphrases/second
250 keys per second is way slower than Aircrack's 1200 keys per second - 5 times slower.
The advantage of using cowpatty, even thought it's slower, is that you can use Rainbow Tables with cowpatty.