Bettercap/Failed DNS Spoofing Attack 2
From charlesreid1
Second experiment, now that I know I need to be running an ARP spoofing attack simultaneous with the DNS attack.
Configure DNS File
We configured this attack to hijack requests for charlesreid1.com:
# Empty lines or lines starting with # will be ignored. local .*charlesreid1\.com
Run ARP+DNS Attack
Start by running the Bettercap command:
bettercap -I wlan1 -O bettercap_extrabacon.log -S ARP -X \
--gateway 192.168.0.1 --target 192.168.0.7 \
--dns extrabacon.conf --dns-port 53 \
--httpd --httpd-path ./pub
This sets up the ARP poisoning, and runs the DNS spoofing on port 53. It runs an HTTP host to host the NOPE page.
Now, we have the sheep being DNS-spoofed. Let's test it out.
Testing It Out
On the sheep, I visit an insecure site, but NOT one that is in the DNS configuration file: http://nytimes.com
Immediately the sheep shows the NOPE page. It's not supposed to.
I visit another insecure site, NOT one that is in the DNS configuration file: http://nba.com
Again, the sheep shows the NOPE page. It's not supposed to.
I visit a secure site: https://dropbox.com.
The Dropbox site loads as expected - no redirects, no issues.
I visit another secure site: https://en.wikipedia.org
Wikipedia loads as expected.
I visit an insecure site: http://mlb.com
The sheep shows the NOPE page. It's not supposed to.
This attack is not working as expected.
It's possible my DNS cache is crusty.
Packet Traffic
Watching the packet traffic, here's what I'm seeing for the requests for insecure sites (e.g., nytimes):
- Sheep types "nytimes.com" into browser
- DNS request packet for nytimes.com server, addressed to gateway, arrives at attacker
- Attacker forwards DNS request to Google public DNS server, 8.8.8.8
- Google public DNS server responds to attacker with 170.149.159.130
- Attacker, masquerading as gateway, sends DNS query response to sheep
Watching the packet traffic flowing, I can actually see from inspecting the DNS packets that the sheep should not be redirected to the NOPE page. And yet... the sheep is still going there, for some reason.
Firewall
Well duh, it's my firewall rule. All the packets going through port 80 are being redirected to port 8081.