Project Euler/198: Difference between revisions
From charlesreid1
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Technique== | ==Technique== | ||
Start with a program that won't scale, and generate intermediate solutions (smaller values of q limit) that we can trust. | Start with a program that won't scale, and generate intermediate solutions (smaller values of q limit) that we can trust. | ||
Then, introduce optimizations to scale further, and use intermediate solutions to verify optimizations aren't changing answers. | |||
q < 10,000 is very fast to compute, but q < 1,000,000 can take way, way longer. | q < 10,000 is very fast to compute, but q < 1,000,000 can take way, way longer. | ||
Revision as of 01:04, 16 April 2025
Problem Statement
A best approximation to a real number x for the denominator bound d is a rational number $ \frac r s $ (in reduced form) with $ s \le d $, so that any rational number $ \frac p q $ which is closer to x than $ \frac r s $ has $ q > d $
Usually the best approximation to a real number is uniquely determined for all denominator bounds. However, there are some exceptions, e.g. $ \frac 9 {40} $ has the two best approximations $ \frac 1 4 $ and $ \frac 1 5 $ for the denominator bound 6. We shall call a real number x ambiguous if there is at least one denominator bound for which x possesses two best approximations. Clearly, an ambiguous number is necessarily rational. How many ambiguous numbers $ x=\frac p q, 0 < x < \frac 1 {100} $, are there whose denominator q does not exceed $ 10^8 $?
Technique
Start with a program that won't scale, and generate intermediate solutions (smaller values of q limit) that we can trust.
Then, introduce optimizations to scale further, and use intermediate solutions to verify optimizations aren't changing answers.
q < 10,000 is very fast to compute, but q < 1,000,000 can take way, way longer.
Flags