From charlesreid1

Line 11: Line 11:
==Technique==
==Technique==


Start with a program that won't scale, and generate intermediate solutions (smaller values of q limit) that we can trust. That way, we can introduce optimizations, be confident they aren't changing answers, and scale further.
Start with a program that won't scale, and generate intermediate solutions (smaller values of q limit) that we can trust.
 
Then, introduce optimizations to scale further, and use intermediate solutions to verify optimizations aren't changing answers.


q < 10,000 is very fast to compute, but q < 1,000,000 can take way, way longer.
q < 10,000 is very fast to compute, but q < 1,000,000 can take way, way longer.

Revision as of 01:04, 16 April 2025

Problem Statement

A best approximation to a real number x for the denominator bound d is a rational number $ \frac r s $ (in reduced form) with $ s \le d $, so that any rational number $ \frac p q $ which is closer to x than $ \frac r s $ has $ q > d $

Usually the best approximation to a real number is uniquely determined for all denominator bounds. However, there are some exceptions, e.g. $ \frac 9 {40} $ has the two best approximations $ \frac 1 4 $ and $ \frac 1 5 $ for the denominator bound 6. We shall call a real number x ambiguous if there is at least one denominator bound for which x possesses two best approximations. Clearly, an ambiguous number is necessarily rational. How many ambiguous numbers $ x=\frac p q, 0 < x < \frac 1 {100} $, are there whose denominator q does not exceed $ 10^8 $?

Technique

Start with a program that won't scale, and generate intermediate solutions (smaller values of q limit) that we can trust.

Then, introduce optimizations to scale further, and use intermediate solutions to verify optimizations aren't changing answers.

q < 10,000 is very fast to compute, but q < 1,000,000 can take way, way longer.

Flags