Composite Experimental Design
From charlesreid1
Overview
Composite experimental design refers to the successive sampling of parameter space in such a way as to construct a first or second order polynomial function.
Explanation
Setting Up the Whole Design
1. Select 5 (or 3) levels for each variable. Code each level with a numerical value, typically between $ -1,1 $ (but can be, e.g., between $ -2,2 $, see Box and Draper 1987).
2. Create variable transforms to translate between the coded levels and the actual input parameter values (see below)
3. Create the full composite design matrix
4. Parse the full factorial matrix from above
5. Parse the fractional factorial matrix from above
6. Parse the one-factor-at-a-time matrix from above
7. Sample function in the following order:
- One factor at a time
- Fractional factorial
- Full factorial
- Full composite
How Many Levels?
The question of whether to choose 3 or 5 levels depends entirely on the case.
Typically, 3-level designs are chosen for experiments where multiple levels create difficulty in experimental setup. In this case, the minimum number of levels is desirable.
However, in simulations, 5-level designs are best, because there is no significant effort on the part of the user when running with a large number of levels.
Variable Transforms
For a variable $ x_i $ with range $ \alpha_i \leq x_i \leq \beta_i $,
- the transformed variable $ \hat{x}_i $ has the range $ -1 \leq \hat{x}_i \leq +1 $ for factorial design
- the transformed variable $ \hat{x}_i $ has the range $ -2 \leq \hat{x}_i \leq +2 $ for composite design
Linear Variables
To transform a linear variable $ x_i $ to the variable $ \hat{x}_i \in [-1, +1] $:
$ \hat{x}_i = \frac{ x_i - \left( \frac{\beta_i - \alpha_i}{2} + \alpha_i \right) }{ \frac{\beta_i - \alpha_i}{2} } $
To transform a linear variable $ x_i $ to the variable $ \hat{x}_i \in [-2, +2] $:
$ \hat{x}_i = \frac{ x_i - \left( \frac{\beta_i - \alpha_i}{2} + \alpha_i \right) }{ \frac{\beta_i - \alpha_i}{4} } $
Log Variables
To transform a log variable $ x_i $ to the variable $ \hat{x}_i \in [-1, +1] $:
$ \hat{x}_i = \frac{ \log{(x_i)} - \left( \frac{ \log{(\beta_i)} - \log{(\alpha_i)}}{2} + \log{(\alpha_i)} \right) }{ \frac{ \log{(\beta_i)} - \log{(\alpha_i)} }{2} } $
To transform a log variable $ x_i $ to the variable $ \hat{x}_i \in [-2, +2] $:
$ \hat{x}_i = \frac{ \log{(x_i)} - \left( \frac{ \log{(\beta_i)} - \log{(\alpha_i)}}{2} + \log{(\alpha_i)} \right) }{ \frac{ \log{(\beta_i)} - \log{(\alpha_i)} }{4} } $
Full Composite Design Matrix
Full Factorial
Fractional Factorial
One Parameter At A Time
Example
Problem Information
For details about the problem, including the input uncertainty map, see Example Problem for Experimental Design
Code
Computing Response Surfaces
Box-Behnken Designs
The relationship between composite and Box Behnken designs is that, if you use a face-centered (i.e. a 3-level) composite design and combine it with a Box Behnken design, you will get a full $ 3^{k} $ factorial design. So composite and Box Behnken designs are both fractional $ 3^{k} $ factorial designs.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||